
BBC fact-finding inquiry into Huw Edwards affair could take couple of months, Davie says
The Lords hearing with Tim Davie is starting.
Tina Stowell (Con), the chair, says this session was scheduled some time ago. But she says they will start by talking about recent events.
She says the committee does not want to pre-empt the BBC’s own investigation, or to intrude into personal matters.
Q: Can you give an update on the inquires underway?
Davie says this has been a difficult affair.
There is a fact-finding investigation underway. That is normal, he says. The BBC is looking at the facts. And it is “keen to receive any information”, he says.
He says this could take weeks, or a couple of months.
His main priority is “to be fair … and act judiciously”, he says.
He says world-class experts in this are working on it at the BBC.
“,”elementId”:”1b3e38d0-fd2b-4aa3-b735-9065cf324b20″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Tina Stowell (Con), the chair, says this session was scheduled some time ago. But she says they will start by talking about recent events.
“,”elementId”:”4d07d15f-4323-464f-85bd-440fcea348c9″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
She says the committee does not want to pre-empt the BBC’s own investigation, or to intrude into personal matters.
“,”elementId”:”d5e6d4f7-6c33-49e9-b4a4-73838420ab2a”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Q: Can you give an update on the inquires underway?
“,”elementId”:”4712ec1c-1b50-41de-84d6-7cb40f6f24b1″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Davie says this has been a difficult affair.
“,”elementId”:”11469e3e-7b60-4e1a-9f43-6785e4801271″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
There is a fact-finding investigation underway. That is normal, he says. The BBC is looking at the facts. And it is “keen to receive any information”, he says.
“,”elementId”:”f3a6486f-9360-45a4-99b2-60927b85138b”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
He says this could take weeks, or a couple of months.
“,”elementId”:”c5a2b87c-e54b-48da-97d9-5f9bd7392e03″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
His main priority is “to be fair … and act judiciously”, he says.
“,”elementId”:”f578d9c8-e2f0-4c96-956c-20a56a910381″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
He says world-class experts in this are working on it at the BBC.
“,”elementId”:”78539a93-96be-40c3-ae6c-553a980846ed”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:true,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689687137000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”14.32 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689687397000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”14.36 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689687397000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”14.36 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”14.36″,”title”:”BBC fact-finding inquiry into Huw Edwards affair could take couple of months, Davie says”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b692568f08ed3a541d1c71″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Tim Davies, the BBC director general, is about to give evidence to the Lords communications committee.
“,”elementId”:”7bb870c3-d132-445e-97ff-ea6a531be1ef”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The hearing will cover the Huw Edwards controversy. In a press notice last week, the committee said one of the issues covered would be:
“,”elementId”:”9b31079c-2f89-4c53-9a5e-32ddf1477d29″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
In light of recent events, what concerns have been raised about the adequacy of the BBC’s governance arrangements and how it is addressing these.
n
“,”elementId”:”9a81572f-913d-4172-87ec-8dc82809c280″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
But the committee said it would also cover other issues, including the BBC’s “independence from government”, proposals for a new funding model and “how the BBC’s commitment to impartiality needs to keep pace with changing societal expectations”.
“,”elementId”:”92939a78-433f-40ff-abda-b9cecf0c23d6″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
There will be a live feed of the hearing at the top of the blog.
“,”elementId”:”519f069b-a01d-4f9b-9337-48a0a6c594f5″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689686614000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”14.23 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689686949000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”14.29 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689686949000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”14.29 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”14.29″,”title”:”BBC director general Tim Davie to be questioned by peers about Huw Edwards controversy”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b687858f08d284f1f0bf29″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The Labour MP Stella Creasy has urged Keir Starmer to commit to getting rid of the two-child benefit cap – on the grounds that this would help a future Labour government save money.
“,”elementId”:”175fa393-0ecd-45f6-b73c-d51a7fe1ab62″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
It is a relatively novel argument, and Creasy sounded like she was trying to be helpful to the Labour leadership when she made her case in an interview on the World at One. She was making a case that would synthesise the views of the Labour majority who probably view the policy as immoral, with the fiscal rectitude favoured by Starmer and Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor.
“,”elementId”:”865a3460-f485-4222-983d-a570c97bab2e”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
(Whether Starmer’s office consider the intervention helpful or not is another matter; they probably just wish the debate would go away.)
“,”elementId”:”407d0be3-5ce3-4083-a882-95922b9b79c7″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Creasy told the World at One:
“,”elementId”:”1144ac6a-6c55-413d-8541-33c9a0667b70″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
Research that is coming out is showing us that, in of itself, [the two-child benefit cap] is potentially costing more than it is saving. It’s fairly common sense, isn’t it? If you make it harder to make ends meet, it doesn’t miraculously give you a job and give you the money to be able to even go to a job or go to a job interview …
n
So for a Labour government absolutely laser focused on the best use of public funds, is this the best use of public funds?
n
“,”elementId”:”04cd6196-9ed1-45bc-8e5d-d469d1066d2f”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
“Laser focused” is a phrase favoured by Reeves when she stressed her commitment to getting value for money for the taxpayer. Creasy was in effect using Reeves’ own rhetoric against her policy.
“,”elementId”:”e76224a9-c56c-4ba0-b7cd-536f9956cecc”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
It has been widely reported that getting rid of the two-child benefit cap would cost £1.3bn. The Child Poverty Action Group (which wants the cap to go) cited this figure in a briefing paper in the spring. Creasy claimed that there was no evidence to suggest that the policy costs the taxpayer more than it saves, but she admitted that the research was “only in its infancy”.
“,”elementId”:”0cc2e85d-cbd8-46bf-946f-750ff9ec557b”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
As evidence, Creasy cited the Larger Families report published by academics yesterday analysing the impact of the overall benefits cap, and the two-child benefits cap. The report does indeed suggest these policies are counterproductive, but it does not argue definitely that the government would save money by abolishing them.
“,”elementId”:”d5cea29f-c8ef-4522-a094-8c1d7f000b50″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
But it does argue that both policies make claimants less likely to work (geneating savings for the taxpayer), not more likely to work, as ministers thought when they introduced them. It says:
“,”elementId”:”239ced1b-ccad-4347-b8e7-ce145f648285″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
[The research involving interviews with claimants] shows the two-child limit can push people further away from the labour market for two main reasons. First, some participants found that the income shock of the two-child limit made it harder to afford the financial costs involved in entering paid work (eg childcare, interview clothes and transport to work). For some, it became harder to afford training or further education …
n
Second, a strong theme from our interviews was the negative impact of the two-child limit on parents’ mental health. This had implications for the participants’ ability to find or sustain employment …
n
Both policies have been routinely defended on the grounds that they encourage people to make ‘better’ choices about family size and to work more hours. We invite policymakers to engage with the evidence shared across this report, which demonstrates that such assumptions are incorrect. The two-child limit has not affected the number of children that families have, while both policies are pushing people further away from, rather than closer to, the paid labour market.
n
“,”elementId”:”41076677-6003-4503-b82b-2fdd7cb8017d”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement”,”media”:{“allImages”:[{“index”:0,”fields”:{“height”:”3454″,”width”:”5180″},”mediaType”:”Image”,”mimeType”:”image/jpeg”,”url”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/140.jpg”}]},”data”:{“alt”:”Stella Creasy speaking in the Commons.”,”caption”:”Stella Creasy speaking in the Commons.”,”credit”:”Photograph: Jessica Taylor/UK parliament/AFP/Getty Images”},”displayCredit”:true,”role”:”inline”,”imageSources”:[{“weighting”:”inline”,”srcSet”:[{“src”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/5180.jpg?width=480&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=b52048c09f911cb22cf0f0aaa135dd13″,”width”:960}]}],”elementId”:”763c5e6b-2e91-47b4-8a67-a540198c4adf”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689683845000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”13.37 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689687372000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”14.36 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689686206000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”14.16 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”14.16″,”title”:”Labour MP Stella Creasy urges Starmer to get rid of two-child benefit cap on grounds this would save, not cost, money”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b682268f0835a0b4952bcf”,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
With the illegal migration bill now on the verge of becoming law, the United Nation’s refugee agency, UNHCR, has issued a fresh condemnation of the measure, which it says breaks international refugee law.
“,”elementId”:”adf10d70-147b-4e04-b356-323049aa990d”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
It urges the government to reverse the law, which it says would otherwise have a “profound impact” on the international legal framework in place protecting refugees
“,”elementId”:”b218e8ac-167f-40e2-a235-8dabda40606c”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Here is an extract from the press statement released by the UNHCR.
“,”elementId”:”bef7d11b-a43a-49e6-bc60-a71190e7e773″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
The bill extinguishes access to asylum in the UK for anyone who arrives irregularly, having passed through a country – however briefly – where they did not face persecution. It bars them from presenting refugee protection or other human rights claims, no matter how compelling their circumstances. In addition, it requires their removal to another country, with no guarantee that they will necessarily be able to access protection there. It creates sweeping new detention powers, with limited judicial oversight.
n
“For decades, the UK has provided refuge to those in need, in line with its international obligations – a tradition of which it has been rightly proud. This new legislation significantly erodes the legal framework that has protected so many, exposing refugees to grave risks in breach of international law,” [Filippo Grandi, the UN high commissioner for refugees] said.
n
The bill denies access to protection in the UK for anyone falling within its scope – including unaccompanied and separated children – regardless of whether they are at risk of persecution, may have suffered human rights violations or whether they are survivors of human trafficking or modern-day slavery and may have other well-founded claims under international human rights and humanitarian law.
n
“Carrying out removals under these circumstances is contrary to prohibitions of refoulement [sending refugees back to countries where they are at risk of prosecution] and collective expulsions, rights to due process, to family and private life, and the principle of best interests of children concerned,” said [Volker Türk, the UN high commissioner for human rights].
n
“,”elementId”:”0e33685a-6778-40e8-82b9-e9e5b263facf”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689682470000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”13.14 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689683314000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”13.28 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689683173000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”13.26 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”13.26″,”title”:”UNHCR condemns illegal migration bill, saying it will undermine laws protecting refugees globally”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b67dd98f0835a0b4952b9e”,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The government is preparing advice for schools in England on how they should respond if pupils want to transition and it is expected to be published this week. But, according to a report by Jason Groves in the Daily Mail, it is being held up because of a row between Gillian Keegan, the education secretary, and Kemi Badenoch, the equalities minister.
“,”elementId”:”71a29b91-5b75-4c13-a358-9f2ca255c4de”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Groves says:
“,”elementId”:”c1b5f6b7-b3e1-435c-a5c8-cd66760c7657″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
The row focuses on the extent to which schools will be required to recognise pupils who want to ‘socially transition’ to a new gender without medical involvement.
n
Mrs Keegan said last month that children should be allowed to use the pronouns of their choice in school, provided they have parental consent. But the move is said to be opposed by equalities minister Kemi Badenoch, who has been lobbying Rishi Sunak to toughen up the government’s stance.
n
Ministers have agreed that trans pupils should not be allowed to use the toilets of their adopted gender or take part in single-sex sports. But division remains over so-called social transitioning.
n
One Whitehall source said the issue had now become mired in legal argument about its precise wording.
n
‘This guidance is now being pushed to the harder end of things and that means more lawyers are getting involved,’ the source said.
n
“,”elementId”:”58c5115b-bae9-4b07-97fc-72455d237914″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
At the No 10 lobby briefing the PM’s spokesperson said that this was a “sensitive” area and work on the guidance was still continuing. He did not give details, but he did take issue with the Daily Mail, and he did not rule out publication of the guidance being delayed. He said it was “not unusual to take legal advice for government guidance”.
“,”elementId”:”d81dac9f-a338-4073-bbc2-2f6b63468424″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689681369000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”12.56 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689683203000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”13.26 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689682124000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”13.08 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”13.08″,”title”:”No 10 refuses to deny publication of trans advice for schools held up by row about how strict it should be”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b679da8f0855274cfb0bd1″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Downing Street has also confirmed that, when the illegal migration bill gets royal assent (see 9.33am), that will not mean that the Home Office will automatically start detaining asylum seekers prior to their removal from the UK.
“,”elementId”:”8c90af5f-f937-4986-86cf-bf5cdbdd75b2″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The PM’s spokesperson said that, when the bill became law, the home secretary would have the power to detain asylum seekers in this way. But the legislation does not “require” her to do that.
“,”elementId”:”98815b61-ef0b-477b-a20f-3e4f4acb63c6″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The government does not want to start detaining asylum seekers until it also has the power to remove them to a third country. Rwanda is the only option at the moment, but the court of appeal recently ruled that removing asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful, and the issue now has to be resolved by the supreme court.
“,”elementId”:”4b2937fa-73eb-4bb2-a7f3-6dfcdf0cadd8″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The spokesperson said the government wanted the act in place before the supreme court case concluded. But he said Suella Braverman, the home secretary, would not seek to detain people ahead of removal to a safe third country while the Rwanda policy was still being challenged in the courts.
“,”elementId”:”ba4661db-8035-4244-9def-19071c241c1c”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689680346000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”12.39 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689680970000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”12.49 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689680971000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”12.49 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”12.49″,”title”:”Home Office will not use illegal migration bill powers to detain refugees until Rwanda court case over, No 10 says”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b678248f082337da643185″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The first asylum seekers will be housed on the Bibby Stockholm barge at Portland in Dorset later this month, Downing Street said this morning.
“,”elementId”:”da5f9ff2-ff46-4d12-8812-18e056e2436a”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Speaking at the daily lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson said:
“,”elementId”:”daf5b2a1-2d3b-4805-978c-3a4a8de45dce”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
It’s undergoing final inspections upon arrival. That’s the last part of the process ahead of the first group of asylum seekers moving into the vessel later this month.
n
“,”elementId”:”9e7fcad8-fa7f-4391-8836-9b9193df86e2″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement”,”media”:{“allImages”:[{“index”:0,”fields”:{“height”:”4932″,”width”:”7395″},”mediaType”:”Image”,”mimeType”:”image/jpeg”,”url”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/140.jpg64b696b5a602b.jpg”}]},”data”:{“alt”:”A woman watching the arrival of the Bibby Stockholm at Portland Harbour this morning.”,”caption”:”A woman watching the arrival of the Bibby Stockholm at Portland harbour this morning.”,”credit”:”Photograph: Dan Kitwood/Getty Images”},”displayCredit”:true,”role”:”inline”,”imageSources”:[{“weighting”:”inline”,”srcSet”:[{“src”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/7395.jpg?width=480&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=d46d36da65d7ee796d15200641a4813d”,”width”:960}]}],”elementId”:”e8316aad-ba8b-4cc2-92ec-abdfbe56a1fb”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689679908000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”12.31 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689681321000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”12.55 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689680306000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”12.38 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”12.38″,”title”:”First asylum seekers to be housed on Bibby Stockholm barge later this month, No 10 says”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b676de8f0855274cfb0b96″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Five Labour metro mayors are preparing to take legal action in a bid to stop the “rushed” planned mass closure of railway station ticket offices, PA Media reports. PA says:
“,”elementId”:”0c1dd943-8d51-4e1d-ae77-62cefa7dc34b”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
The Greater Manchester mayor, Andy Burnham, who is one of those involved, declared “we will fight this all the way” as he launched a bid to prevent the action.
n
Train operators unveiled proposals earlier this month to close nearly all station ticket offices in England after the transport secretary, Mark Harper, urged them to cut costs.
n
They launched a three-week consultation on the measure.
n
The industry body the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) insisted ticket office staff would be moved on to station platforms and concourses to “modernise customer service”.
n
But Burnham said: “These closures will affect over 2,000 jobs. It’s just not the case that this is about redeploying staff. This will be a serious reduction in the level of support available to people when they are travelling. It will further erode what remains of trust in travelling on our trains and we think it is the wrong move at the wrong time.
n
“We’re very worried that these plans are being railroaded through. Today we are confirming that as five mayors representing millions of people across England, we are fighting back.”
n
The other mayors involved are: Tracy Brabin of West Yorkshire, Steve Rotheram of Liverpool city region, Oliver Coppard of South Yorkshire and Dr Nik Johnson of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
n
Burnham said the “rushed” consultation “does not provide a legal basis” for closing ticket offices, meaning it “should be declared null and void”.
n
He went on: “Section 29 of the Railways Act 2005 sets out a very clear and detailed process which must be followed if a train operating company proposes to close a station or any part of a station. That process has simply not been followed in this instance.
n
“For instance, it requires a 12-week consultation. Of course that is nothing like what is being currently undertaken by the train operating companies.”
n
The mayors intend to send a pre-action protocol letter to operators in their areas, setting out why they believe closing ticket offices in this way is unlawful.
n
A spokesperson for the RDG said: “All train operators are complying with the consultation process as set out in the ticketing and settlement agreement.
n
“They include proposals which, across the network as a whole, would see more staff on concourses and ticket halls to help passengers than there are today, helping with a whole range of needs, from buying tickets to journey planning and helping with accessibility needs.”
n
“,”elementId”:”31f06cbe-fd41-4ddb-bd70-74e9207b35f1″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement”,”media”:{“allImages”:[{“index”:0,”fields”:{“height”:”2335″,”width”:”3500″},”mediaType”:”Image”,”mimeType”:”image/jpeg”,”url”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/140.jpg64b696b5c625c.jpg”}]},”data”:{“alt”:”Left to right: Steve Rotheram, Tracy Brabin and Andy Burnham at the Convention of the North in January.”,”caption”:”Left to right: Steve Rotheram, Tracy Brabin and Andy Burnham at the Convention of the North in January.”,”credit”:”Photograph: James Speakman/PA Media”},”displayCredit”:true,”role”:”inline”,”imageSources”:[{“weighting”:”inline”,”srcSet”:[{“src”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/3500.jpg?width=480&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=7a162a17c017123eb80a60acd8743e70″,”width”:960}]}],”elementId”:”77b3b96f-9645-4989-a37f-d4aaadfc79ea”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689679582000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”12.26 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689681502000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”12.58 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689679808000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”12.30 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”12.30″,”title”:”Labour metro mayors threaten legal action over ‘rushed’ mass closure of rail ticket offices”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b6714f8f086e12d8a9712d”,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Mish Rahman has posted the full text of his statement about the decision to block him from the contest to be Labour’s next candidate for Wolverhampton West on Twitter. (See 11.34am.)
“,”elementId”:”dadea5fa-446b-4b38-8231-552c8c9f20fe”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
He says it is a matter of “serious concern” that he was blocked because of how he voted on a matter before the national executive committee (NEC). And he says that, even though he has been blocked from being on a longlist himself, as an NEC member he is still choosing who gets included in other longlists. He says:
“,”elementId”:”ec5c725e-5279-489c-a992-c3610d0e0240″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
As a two-term, currently elected member of Labour’s NEC, I have chaired panels for longlisting in other parliamentary selections – I am therefore allowed to longlist candidates but not to be longlisted myself.
n
I was blocked for how I voted on the NEC in relation to the composition of party disciplinary structures, following the EHRC report. This was a position shared by an array of NEC members, including trade union representatives. Being blocked for casting a vote in a democratic process should be a serious concern for all of us in the Labour party.
n
“,”elementId”:”bbbce24e-40ec-46b5-8f11-0635fdaad992″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TweetBlockElement”,”html”:”
I have not made the longlist in the Wolverhampton West parliamentary selection despite the backing of seven trade unions and affiliates.
I have chaired longlisting panels for other Parliamentary selections but deemed not a 'high quality candidate' to be longlisted myself. pic.twitter.com/0PPufZQvkz
— Mish Rahman (@mish_rahman) July 18, 2023
“,”url”:”https://twitter.com/mish_rahman/status/1681227085082238976″,”id”:”1681227085082238976″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”ec8e4566-1f5a-419e-9655-767f7abdd0cf”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Momentum, the leftwing Labour group, has condemned the decision to exclude Rahman from the selection contest. A Momentum spokesperson said:
“,”elementId”:”fe240d25-2967-4bdb-b57e-bcb6b28f0496″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
The vital signs of Labour party democracy are flashing red. It is simply indefensible that a member of Labour’s own executive can be blocked from standing for selection for a free vote on the NEC despite previously being entrusted with overseeing MP selections elsewhere.
n
“,”elementId”:”ca9fac0f-c485-480d-94e9-769087a32350″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689678159000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”12.02 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689681548000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”12.59 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689678668000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”12.11 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”12.11″,”title”:”Mish Rahman says is it matter of ‘serious concern’ he was blocked from being Labour candidate over how he voted on NEC”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b66b968f086e12d8a970f4″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Labour MPs are “seething with anger” about Keir Starmer’s decision to say the party would not get rid of the two-child benefit cap, Jeremy Corbyn said this morning.
“,”elementId”:”ebd15c64-41cb-40ba-bf5b-33cca4586af1″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Corbyn, Starmer’s predecessor as leader, told LBC that he had spoken to “quite a lot of Labour MPs” about this issue. He went on:
“,”elementId”:”725336ba-072e-43fe-8a36-a8a44f1d4d91″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
They are seething with anger, particularly as commitments have been made regularly by the party that we would take children out of poverty. Even the Blair government, which Keir Starmer often quotes, did do a great deal to lift children out of poverty by not having a two-child policy …
n
Even in areas like mine, there are high levels of child poverty – probably 40% of the children in my constituency. All across the north-east, which Jamie [Driscoll] represents – a third of all children across the whole of the region are living in poverty. That has got to go and got to change.
n
And it’s the Labour party that ought to be offering that pathway to change and it’s not doing it at the moment.
n
“,”elementId”:”2ce1e633-3b1c-4785-a8ba-9072612213b7″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Corbyn, who has been suspended from the parliamentary Labour party over his response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission into antisemitism in the party when he was leader, has been banned from standing as a candidate again for the party at the next election.
“,”elementId”:”c3289f96-b097-449d-8e87-419e66022247″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
In the interview he said he had not ruled out standing as an independent candidate in the next London mayoral election, but he did not elaborate, saying he wanted the interview to focus on child poverty.
“,”elementId”:”44020c97-75db-4f42-9cf3-c181e68c6e25″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement”,”media”:{“allImages”:[{“index”:0,”fields”:{“height”:”2335″,”width”:”3500″},”mediaType”:”Image”,”mimeType”:”image/jpeg”,”url”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/140.jpg64b696b5e728e.jpg”}]},”data”:{“alt”:”Jeremy Corbyn speaking at a rally against the closure of rail ticket offices last week.”,”caption”:”Jeremy Corbyn speaking at a rally against the closure of rail ticket offices last week.”,”credit”:”Photograph: Jonathan Brady/PA”},”displayCredit”:true,”role”:”inline”,”imageSources”:[{“weighting”:”inline”,”srcSet”:[{“src”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/3500.jpg64b696b5f2a85.jpg?width=480&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=f5a7dc6f371394e73570d5513792683d”,”width”:960}]}],”elementId”:”c31a6e9a-a368-438a-983b-ba4737bbbe66″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689676694000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”11.38 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689677429000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”11.50 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689677430000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”11.50 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”11.50″,”title”:”Labour MPs ‘seething with anger’ about Starmer’s stance on two-child benefit cap, says Jeremy Corbyn”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b667238f0855274cfb0aac”,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Keir Starmer faces fresh protests over a parliamentary selection after a member of Labour’s governing body was blocked from standing in Wolverhampton.
“,”elementId”:”bcfe5b99-c11f-4f05-aa6b-bd55e2eefffc”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Mish Rahman, a notable Muslim voice within the party and graduate of the inaugural Bernie Grant leadership programme, has been blocked from the longlist for the new Wolverhampton West seat.
“,”elementId”:”1ebabed3-1da3-4cd7-aa7d-453e480747a6″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Rahman, one of the few leftwingers left on the national executive committee, had won the backing of seven trade unions and affiliated societies, which would normally have seen him automatically longlisted. But officials said he was being blocked because of his response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s report into Labour and antisemitism.
“,”elementId”:”50add8d0-04a7-4776-bbea-b63845995313″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
After he was blocked last week, Rahman used the party’s new selections appeal process, but his appeal was not upheld.
“,”elementId”:”0d7b64f2-3cae-4921-8ddc-900a24d1d33c”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The appeal panel accepted that Rahman was not opposed to the EHRC report itself. But Rahman did oppose some party rule changes that were proposed, and discussed at the NEC, as a consequence of the report, and the appeal panel concluded this meant his candidature posed “a risk to the party’s electoral chances”.
“,”elementId”:”60f602bc-f60f-4d0f-874a-ed2f4a358ce7″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Rahman is now the third graduate of the Bernie Grant leadership programme – aimed at empowering BAME Labour members to run for office – to be blocked from standing.
“,”elementId”:”542f6a21-9807-47e4-b500-6681d5e71ef7″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Reflecting on his failed bid to stand as an MP, Rahman said:
“,”elementId”:”0968bf59-7776-4529-8c49-79ef00e9ee8d”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
This is not a shock – it is what I and my team expected.
n
None of my fellow Bernie Grant leadership programme alumni have been selected.
n
We were told the party would support us towards leadership positions as black and ethnic minority activists – yet after this longlisting process, nothing has changed.
n
“,”elementId”:”ae5b53ec-7fa3-40af-a8e1-93f9af87090b”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689675555000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”11.19 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689677389000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”11.49 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689676458000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”11.34 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”11.34″,”title”:”Leftwing NEC member blocked from standing in contest to be Labour MP”,”contributors”:[{“name”:”Aletha Adu”,”imageUrl”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/Aletha_Adu-2C_L.png?width=300&quality=85&auto=format&fit=max&s=40336a400d450666a906163475a982b3″}],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b664788f0855274cfb0a83″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
More than 28,000 people in England and Wales have been convicted of breaches of Covid-19 regulations, despite the government’s insistence that it never intended to criminalise people for minor infractions during the pandemic, Maeve McClenaghan reports.
“,”elementId”:”ebeb77d5-6744-44ac-b488-fe71b685be35″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.RichLinkBlockElement”,”url”:”https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/18/more-than-28000-convicted-of-covid-rule-breaches-in-england-and-wales”,”text”:”More than 28,000 convicted of Covid rule breaches in England and Wales”,”prefix”:”Related: “,”role”:”thumbnail”,”elementId”:”c3bc981b-ec30-4a59-a5cf-43eb573be41e”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689674872000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”11.07 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689674915000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”11.08 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689674915000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”11.08 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”11.08″,”title”:”More than 28,000 convicted of Covid rule breaches in England and Wales”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b65f048f0855274cfb0a45″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
The SNP has accused the Scottish Labour party of trying to face both ways at the same time on the two-child benefit cap.
“,”elementId”:”91499f4b-f806-40a7-86af-d131921ae12e”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Yesterday Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, said that he was opposed to the policy, and wanted to see the cap removed as quickly as possible, but that he acceped that Keir Starmer could not afford to do everything he wanted to immediately. Lucy Powell, the shadow culture secretary, made a similar argument this morning (see 10.21am), insisting the two positions were not inconsistent.
“,”elementId”:”da788fcf-430d-42bb-8d9b-7f41c4bbac89″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
But Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s leader at Westminster, told the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland:
“,”elementId”:”bd6730d8-5500-4138-8c22-ff7d534071fb”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
Anas Sarwar appears to be rubbing some Brasso on his neck this morning, because he is trying to con the people of Scotland into believing he is against the policy when just yesterday on the television he was saying he backs Keir Starmer’s position.
n
The reality is that London Labour have given a diktat to the Scottish Labour leader that he needs to support their ridiculous and heinous position in relation to this policy and Anas Sarwar has followed suit.
n
“,”elementId”:”feaa0b08-6623-41a6-8b1c-d100ee6f6aa0″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Asked if he was saying that Sarwar was not being sincere when he said he opposed the cap, Flynn said there was a “big difference” between campaigning against something and getting rid of it while in power.
“,”elementId”:”24857cd0-2e4d-4ee9-91ec-974a0365444a”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement”,”media”:{“allImages”:[{“index”:0,”fields”:{“height”:”5311″,”width”:”7967″},”mediaType”:”Image”,”mimeType”:”image/jpeg”,”url”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/140.jpg64b696b621ab0.jpg”}]},”data”:{“alt”:”Stephen Flynn speaking in the Commons.”,”caption”:”Stephen Flynn speaking in the Commons.”,”credit”:”Photograph: Uk Parliament/Reuters”},”displayCredit”:true,”role”:”inline”,”imageSources”:[{“weighting”:”inline”,”srcSet”:[{“src”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/7967.jpg?width=480&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=ede0e7447e4f568c79da44b0b49d7091″,”width”:960}]}],”elementId”:”7f2d7159-d73b-42aa-bca3-32f69f336cf6″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689673476000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”10.44 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689674236000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”10.57 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689674236000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”10.57 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”10.57″,”title”:”SNP accuses Labour of trying to face both ways on getting rid of two-child benefit cap”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b65ad58f0820b06120505d”,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
One of the curiosities of political journalism is that, when a politician says something blindingly obvious, it can sometimes count as news. Andrew Bowie, an energy minister, was in that category this morning when he was asked on Times Radio about the three byelection on Thursday, where the Conservative party is defending majorities of 20,137 (Selby and Ainsty), 19,213 (Somerton and Frome) and 7,210 (Uxbridge and South Ruislip).
“,”elementId”:”627ee2ac-9b55-4276-ab85-e638f9b838aa”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
“Of course it’s possible we could lose all three,” Bowie said.
“,”elementId”:”d9b6498d-45cc-4e69-ade0-dfc2da0df8e0″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
But he went on:
“,”elementId”:”9ea0d1c1-784b-4509-b6ba-6c480d89b041″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
But it’s also possible that we might win all three. I’m an optimist, I’m a Scottish Conservative and Scotland football fan – I have to be an optimist.
n
“,”elementId”:”f8b577fb-71c6-4e34-b796-12f87c618496″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
At Westminster the general assumption is that the Conservatives will lose all three seats – and that the chances of them winning all three are about as slim as the chances of Scotland winning the next World Cup.
“,”elementId”:”37f32322-2c39-4e0f-a2a6-8ea0dc4b2318″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689672405000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”10.26 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689673209000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”10.40 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689673209000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”10.40 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”10.40″,”title”:”Tories ‘could lose all three’ byelections this week, says minister”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b6549f8f0820b06120502f”,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Lucy Powell, the shadow culture secretary, has played down claims that Labour is split over whether or not to reverse the two-child benefit cap.
“,”elementId”:”db631ad5-4365-4b5c-93f8-2947f90da040″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
In an interview with Sky News this morning, she claimed that there was no contradiction between viewing the policy as a bad one, and accepting it would have to stay until money could be found to reverse it.
“,”elementId”:”15cb9a4d-fcc4-4dc0-9ea2-89c5a8a01253″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
She even defended the position by saying “there is no money left” – a line used in a joke note left by a Labour Treasury minister for his successor in 2010 which has been used endlessly by the Tories ever since as supposed proof of Labour’s economic irresponsibility.
“,”elementId”:”d315d5ad-9172-4d3d-99ac-4178e79cb610″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Keir Starmer triggered a row on this issue on Sunday when he suggested the party was committed to keeping the two-child benefit cap – a policy which has been widely criticised for forcing families into poverty, while failing to have the behavioural impact ministers expected when it was introduced.
“,”elementId”:”09e5918e-383d-495f-a25b-ff1c4186e77c”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Starmer’s comments caused alarm within his party because he went further than other shadow ministers, like Rachel Reeves, who have left open the possibility that a Labour government might abolish the cap.
“,”elementId”:”87d94166-77cc-40c9-b022-7158b7b3c71c”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Explaining Labour’s position, Powell told Sky News:
“,”elementId”:”86e48068-1546-45e0-9da6-38421453a3be”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
We’ve opposed this policy, this is not a good policy. We’ve opposed it for many years through parliament, but we’re now in a very different economic situation.
n
As a famous phrase would go, there is no money left, the government has absolutely tanked the economy.
n
I don’t know it is dividing the shadow cabinet.
n
“,”elementId”:”145f9aaa-00ee-47a4-85f4-ce6502da5aaa”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
When it was put to her that Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow work and pensions secretary, has described the cap as “heinous”, she replied:
“,”elementId”:”a23d9ce2-77de-4b16-a6a5-4ac48fbccc9e”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
Both can be true at the same time, that things can be a bad policy, they can be bad politics, but the economic reality is what we’re now faced with.
n
There are lots of bad policies … we’re not implementing them, it’s about not reversing [them].
n
“,”elementId”:”8026b05d-bd2a-4351-a44e-3f758ede02d2″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement”,”media”:{“allImages”:[{“index”:0,”fields”:{“height”:”2658″,”width”:”3987″},”mediaType”:”Image”,”mimeType”:”image/jpeg”,”url”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/140.jpg64b696b641ae5.jpg”}]},”data”:{“alt”:”Lucy Powell.”,”caption”:”Lucy Powell.”,”credit”:”Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images”},”displayCredit”:true,”role”:”inline”,”imageSources”:[{“weighting”:”inline”,”srcSet”:[{“src”:”http://londonpress.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/echo/3987.jpg?width=480&quality=45&auto=format&fit=max&dpr=2&s=8394030c378f6f6b0d2d3b76cbbe0575″,”width”:960}]}],”elementId”:”57cea3cd-1847-4205-9ee2-6ca5b0f6f8cb”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689670815000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”10.00 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689672073000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”10.21 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689672073000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”10.21 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”10.21″,”title”:”Shadow culture secretary Lucy Powell plays down claims Labour split over two-child benefit cap”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b650c28f08742a26fe9745″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
A barge that will be used to house 500 asylum seekers has belatedly arrived at Portland, Dorset, after voting in the House of Lords paved the way for the government’s illegal migration bill to become law, Ben Quinn reports.
“,”elementId”:”7b94c5a1-db2d-426d-a36f-951009ac6b04″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.RichLinkBlockElement”,”url”:”https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/18/uk-migration-bill-to-become-law-as-government-sees-off-lords-challenge”,”text”:”Asylum barge docks as Lords passes ‘shameful’ UK illegal migration bill”,”prefix”:”Related: “,”role”:”thumbnail”,”elementId”:”83e662b2-1bf7-4094-a56a-70a5924d7969″}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689669826000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”09.43 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689669886000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”09.44 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689669886000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”09.44 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”09.44″,”title”:”Asylum barge docks as Lords passes ‘shameful’ UK illegal migration bill”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”},{“id”:”64b638eb8f08de0be01a6370″,”elements”:[{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Good morning. Shortly after midnight the government won the last of five votes in the House of Lords on the illegal migration bill, meaning the amendments to the bill passed by peers last week have been reversed, the bill is now broadly as the government wants it (it accepted some concessions in the early phase of ‘ping pong’) and it is now due to get royal assent, possibly very soon. The full story is here.
“,”elementId”:”a08c1047-0a4d-4939-bce4-99f79e9ddf6e”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.RichLinkBlockElement”,”url”:”https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/18/uk-migration-bill-to-become-law-as-government-sees-off-lords-challenge”,”text”:”Asylum seeker barge docks as lords vote for ‘shameful’ UK illegal migration bill”,”prefix”:”Related: “,”role”:”thumbnail”,”elementId”:”4602da3c-efc7-4aaa-84eb-4b6a0a2d8ce4″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Officially, the Lords did not back down. There were five divisions last night, and the government won all of them.
“,”elementId”:”63434dd9-7b7c-4967-b43f-3b2bf1847140″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
But at least one vote was pulled, after Justin Welby, the archbishop of Canterbury, decided not to put his amendment, saying the government should produce an international strategy for tackling migration, to a vote.
“,”elementId”:”ad18930c-242a-4530-b85e-5b070e855390″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
And some of the peers who voted against the government on this bill in earlier divisions were not in the voting lobbies last night. In votes on this bill earlier this month there were up to 235 peers voting against the government. Last night the anti-goverment vote was never higher than 200, and the Tories won with a higher-than-usual turnout of Tory peers although their majority was only seven on one vote. The opposition went down fighting, but the numbers imply they weren’t trying as hard as in the past – which is normal in a chamber where it is accepted that ultimately the elected house has to have its way.
“,”elementId”:”62e13870-5426-4f66-a81f-407d21132abd”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
All this is very good news for the Home Office. But there was less good news for them on the Today programme this morning when Sir Mark Rowley, the commissioner of the Metropolitan police, gave them a kicking over their failure to change rules that make it very hard for him to sack rogue officers.
“,”elementId”:”37b9af27-7c1f-4e17-88f7-0c300ce3a535″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Rowley has been complaining about this ever since his appointment. Here is a story from November last year, and in January he went futher, saying the regulations were “crazy”. Ministers said they would do something about this. But still nothing has happened, and Rowley said he was “frustrated” about the lack of action. He said:
“,”elementId”:”2c6c0894-503a-4e0f-87ed-69851cd383ea”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
The government announced a review that was, I think, due to report in May to look at police regulations and making the sort of changes I’d asked for. We haven’t yet heard the results of that review, and I’m frustrated. I need those changes in regulations to help me get on with them because some of the processes are too long, too bureaucratic.
n
And some of the decisions are made outside the Met. So people we’ve decided shouldn’t be police officers – an independent lawyer says, ‘Well, bad luck, you’ve got to keep them.’
n
That can’t be right. No other employer that has to deal with that. If I’m trying to get the minority out the organisation, whilst helping the majority of my people succeed, it’s not helpful to have useless, slow bureaucratic processes.
n
“,”elementId”:”123b7925-8354-4de9-9cba-1a625f1cc01c”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Asked why the government was taking so long to respond, Rowley replied:
“,”elementId”:”2b579f52-ffdf-4043-bc30-2ed461a51d9f”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
I don’t know. There are legal technicalities and I’m sure there’s lots of reasons for them to work through. But I’m in a man in a hurry. We’re an organisation in a hurry to build the trust of Londoners and I’d like that support as quickly as possible.
n
“,”elementId”:”f6495467-997e-41ec-8a8f-f5669d0ca0f0″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Rowley also claimed that leaders in other organisations did not face the same constraints.
“,”elementId”:”f83f8416-0d7a-416f-8ce4-a3f75f1e7b48″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.BlockquoteBlockElement”,”html”:”
n
Why are we pretty much the only organisation where the leaders aren’t able to decide whether people stay in the organisation or no ….
n
You’re robustly challenging me on the culture of the Met and our ability to build trust in communities. It seems a little perverse, doesn’t it, that I don’t get to decide who works here. That’s a bit weird, and I don’t think anybody else works in an organisation where that’s the case.
n
“,”elementId”:”122c5d52-8808-4f7f-8d18-15879a5a030c”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Rowley was being interviewed because today the Met is announcing its New Met for London plan. Vikram Dodd has more on that here.
“,”elementId”:”17014b76-6e3a-4f72-8f57-f0d6917532d6″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.RichLinkBlockElement”,”url”:”https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/12/met-police-chief-its-crazy-i-cant-sack-toxic-officers-who-broke-the-law-mark-rowley”,”text”:”Met police chief: it’s crazy I can’t sack ‘toxic’ officers who broke the law “,”prefix”:”Related: “,”role”:”thumbnail”,”elementId”:”0a6bdb78-937a-4380-b3c6-6e2e3a3f0aea”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Here is the agenda for the day.
“,”elementId”:”4871ac22-ec36-49b7-9b17-e24a248509bb”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
Morning: Rishi Sunak chairs cabinet.
“,”elementId”:”1b9c58f9-0420-4a30-83fa-e2227a74dc30″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
11am: Grant Shapps, the energy secretary, gives a speech at the launch of Great British Nuclear.
“,”elementId”:”5631ed76-589b-414d-83ac-02bbdac70aa3″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
“,”elementId”:”275fabb3-76c8-4aa1-ad26-9f601016caec”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
12.30pm: Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, gives a statement to MPs about his defence command paper.
“,”elementId”:”ae880568-d1c9-40ef-ba40-1620299d1f7b”},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
2.30pm: Tim Davie, the BBC director general, gives evidence to the Lords communications committee.
“,”elementId”:”5488e674-f95b-4738-92d9-e69708d79491″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
4.15pm: Keir Starmer gives a speech at the Future of Britain conference organised by the Tony Blair Institute. Afterwards he will take part in a Q&A with Blair himself.
“,”elementId”:”95c687d8-fc27-48a1-bbab-d8e275beb258″},{“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”
If you want to contact me, do try the “send us a message” feature. You’ll see it just below the byline – on the left of the screen, if you are reading on a PC or a laptop. This is for people who want to message me directly. I find it very useful when people message to point out errors (even typos – no mistake is too small to correct). Often I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either in the comments below the line, privately (if you leave an email address and that seems more appropriate), or in the main blog, if I think it is a topic of wide interest.
“,”elementId”:”276cd422-b005-4433-ba3e-b5e64cb26a9f”}],”attributes”:{“pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false},”blockCreatedOn”:1689669233000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”09.33 BST”,”blockLastUpdated”:1689687041000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”14.30 BST”,”blockFirstPublished”:1689669233000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”09.33 BST”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”09.33″,”title”:”Met chief says he’s ‘frustrated’ ministers haven’t changed rules to make it easier for rogue officers to be sacked”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 18 Jul 2023 14.37 BST”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 18 Jul 2023 09.33 BST”}],”filterKeyEvents”:false,”format”:{“display”:0,”theme”:0,”design”:11},”id”:”key-events-carousel-mobile”}”>
Key events
Davie says he has also asked for a quick look at what has been “red flagged” during this.
That work is taking place immediately, he says.
He says there is also a review of any lessons to be learnt in terms of protocols and procedures. That will report in the autumn, he says.
BBC fact-finding inquiry into Huw Edwards affair could take couple of months, Davie says
The Lords hearing with Tim Davie is starting.
Tina Stowell (Con), the chair, says this session was scheduled some time ago. But she says they will start by talking about recent events.
She says the committee does not want to pre-empt the BBC’s own investigation, or to intrude into personal matters.
Q: Can you give an update on the inquires underway?
Davie says this has been a difficult affair.
There is a fact-finding investigation underway. That is normal, he says. The BBC is looking at the facts. And it is “keen to receive any information”, he says.
He says this could take weeks, or a couple of months.
His main priority is “to be fair … and act judiciously”, he says.
He says world-class experts in this are working on it at the BBC.
BBC director general Tim Davie to be questioned by peers about Huw Edwards controversy
Tim Davies, the BBC director general, is about to give evidence to the Lords communications committee.
The hearing will cover the Huw Edwards controversy. In a press notice last week, the committee said one of the issues covered would be:
In light of recent events, what concerns have been raised about the adequacy of the BBC’s governance arrangements and how it is addressing these.
But the committee said it would also cover other issues, including the BBC’s “independence from government”, proposals for a new funding model and “how the BBC’s commitment to impartiality needs to keep pace with changing societal expectations”.
There will be a live feed of the hearing at the top of the blog.
Labour MP Stella Creasy urges Starmer to get rid of two-child benefit cap on grounds this would save, not cost, money
The Labour MP Stella Creasy has urged Keir Starmer to commit to getting rid of the two-child benefit cap – on the grounds that this would help a future Labour government save money.
It is a relatively novel argument, and Creasy sounded like she was trying to be helpful to the Labour leadership when she made her case in an interview on the World at One. She was making a case that would synthesise the views of the Labour majority who probably view the policy as immoral, with the fiscal rectitude favoured by Starmer and Rachel Reeves, the shadow chancellor.
(Whether Starmer’s office consider the intervention helpful or not is another matter; they probably just wish the debate would go away.)
Creasy told the World at One:
Research that is coming out is showing us that, in of itself, [the two-child benefit cap] is potentially costing more than it is saving. It’s fairly common sense, isn’t it? If you make it harder to make ends meet, it doesn’t miraculously give you a job and give you the money to be able to even go to a job or go to a job interview …
So for a Labour government absolutely laser focused on the best use of public funds, is this the best use of public funds?
“Laser focused” is a phrase favoured by Reeves when she stressed her commitment to getting value for money for the taxpayer. Creasy was in effect using Reeves’ own rhetoric against her policy.
It has been widely reported that getting rid of the two-child benefit cap would cost £1.3bn. The Child Poverty Action Group (which wants the cap to go) cited this figure in a briefing paper in the spring. Creasy claimed that there was no evidence to suggest that the policy costs the taxpayer more than it saves, but she admitted that the research was “only in its infancy”.
As evidence, Creasy cited the Larger Families report published by academics yesterday analysing the impact of the overall benefits cap, and the two-child benefits cap. The report does indeed suggest these policies are counterproductive, but it does not argue definitely that the government would save money by abolishing them.
But it does argue that both policies make claimants less likely to work (geneating savings for the taxpayer), not more likely to work, as ministers thought when they introduced them. It says:
[The research involving interviews with claimants] shows the two-child limit can push people further away from the labour market for two main reasons. First, some participants found that the income shock of the two-child limit made it harder to afford the financial costs involved in entering paid work (eg childcare, interview clothes and transport to work). For some, it became harder to afford training or further education …
Second, a strong theme from our interviews was the negative impact of the two-child limit on parents’ mental health. This had implications for the participants’ ability to find or sustain employment …
Both policies have been routinely defended on the grounds that they encourage people to make ‘better’ choices about family size and to work more hours. We invite policymakers to engage with the evidence shared across this report, which demonstrates that such assumptions are incorrect. The two-child limit has not affected the number of children that families have, while both policies are pushing people further away from, rather than closer to, the paid labour market.
UNHCR condemns illegal migration bill, saying it will undermine laws protecting refugees globally
With the illegal migration bill now on the verge of becoming law, the United Nation’s refugee agency, UNHCR, has issued a fresh condemnation of the measure, which it says breaks international refugee law.
It urges the government to reverse the law, which it says would otherwise have a “profound impact” on the international legal framework in place protecting refugees
Here is an extract from the press statement released by the UNHCR.
The bill extinguishes access to asylum in the UK for anyone who arrives irregularly, having passed through a country – however briefly – where they did not face persecution. It bars them from presenting refugee protection or other human rights claims, no matter how compelling their circumstances. In addition, it requires their removal to another country, with no guarantee that they will necessarily be able to access protection there. It creates sweeping new detention powers, with limited judicial oversight.
“For decades, the UK has provided refuge to those in need, in line with its international obligations – a tradition of which it has been rightly proud. This new legislation significantly erodes the legal framework that has protected so many, exposing refugees to grave risks in breach of international law,” [Filippo Grandi, the UN high commissioner for refugees] said.
The bill denies access to protection in the UK for anyone falling within its scope – including unaccompanied and separated children – regardless of whether they are at risk of persecution, may have suffered human rights violations or whether they are survivors of human trafficking or modern-day slavery and may have other well-founded claims under international human rights and humanitarian law.
“Carrying out removals under these circumstances is contrary to prohibitions of refoulement [sending refugees back to countries where they are at risk of prosecution] and collective expulsions, rights to due process, to family and private life, and the principle of best interests of children concerned,” said [Volker Türk, the UN high commissioner for human rights].
No 10 refuses to deny publication of trans advice for schools held up by row about how strict it should be
The government is preparing advice for schools in England on how they should respond if pupils want to transition and it is expected to be published this week. But, according to a report by Jason Groves in the Daily Mail, it is being held up because of a row between Gillian Keegan, the education secretary, and Kemi Badenoch, the equalities minister.
Groves says:
The row focuses on the extent to which schools will be required to recognise pupils who want to ‘socially transition’ to a new gender without medical involvement.
Mrs Keegan said last month that children should be allowed to use the pronouns of their choice in school, provided they have parental consent. But the move is said to be opposed by equalities minister Kemi Badenoch, who has been lobbying Rishi Sunak to toughen up the government’s stance.
Ministers have agreed that trans pupils should not be allowed to use the toilets of their adopted gender or take part in single-sex sports. But division remains over so-called social transitioning.
One Whitehall source said the issue had now become mired in legal argument about its precise wording.
‘This guidance is now being pushed to the harder end of things and that means more lawyers are getting involved,’ the source said.
At the No 10 lobby briefing the PM’s spokesperson said that this was a “sensitive” area and work on the guidance was still continuing. He did not give details, but he did take issue with the Daily Mail, and he did not rule out publication of the guidance being delayed. He said it was “not unusual to take legal advice for government guidance”.
Home Office will not use illegal migration bill powers to detain refugees until Rwanda court case over, No 10 says
Downing Street has also confirmed that, when the illegal migration bill gets royal assent (see 9.33am), that will not mean that the Home Office will automatically start detaining asylum seekers prior to their removal from the UK.
The PM’s spokesperson said that, when the bill became law, the home secretary would have the power to detain asylum seekers in this way. But the legislation does not “require” her to do that.
The government does not want to start detaining asylum seekers until it also has the power to remove them to a third country. Rwanda is the only option at the moment, but the court of appeal recently ruled that removing asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful, and the issue now has to be resolved by the supreme court.
The spokesperson said the government wanted the act in place before the supreme court case concluded. But he said Suella Braverman, the home secretary, would not seek to detain people ahead of removal to a safe third country while the Rwanda policy was still being challenged in the courts.
First asylum seekers to be housed on Bibby Stockholm barge later this month, No 10 says
The first asylum seekers will be housed on the Bibby Stockholm barge at Portland in Dorset later this month, Downing Street said this morning.
Speaking at the daily lobby briefing, the PM’s spokesperson said:
It’s undergoing final inspections upon arrival. That’s the last part of the process ahead of the first group of asylum seekers moving into the vessel later this month.
Labour metro mayors threaten legal action over ‘rushed’ mass closure of rail ticket offices
Five Labour metro mayors are preparing to take legal action in a bid to stop the “rushed” planned mass closure of railway station ticket offices, PA Media reports. PA says:
The Greater Manchester mayor, Andy Burnham, who is one of those involved, declared “we will fight this all the way” as he launched a bid to prevent the action.
Train operators unveiled proposals earlier this month to close nearly all station ticket offices in England after the transport secretary, Mark Harper, urged them to cut costs.
They launched a three-week consultation on the measure.
The industry body the Rail Delivery Group (RDG) insisted ticket office staff would be moved on to station platforms and concourses to “modernise customer service”.
But Burnham said: “These closures will affect over 2,000 jobs. It’s just not the case that this is about redeploying staff. This will be a serious reduction in the level of support available to people when they are travelling. It will further erode what remains of trust in travelling on our trains and we think it is the wrong move at the wrong time.
“We’re very worried that these plans are being railroaded through. Today we are confirming that as five mayors representing millions of people across England, we are fighting back.”
The other mayors involved are: Tracy Brabin of West Yorkshire, Steve Rotheram of Liverpool city region, Oliver Coppard of South Yorkshire and Dr Nik Johnson of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough.
Burnham said the “rushed” consultation “does not provide a legal basis” for closing ticket offices, meaning it “should be declared null and void”.
He went on: “Section 29 of the Railways Act 2005 sets out a very clear and detailed process which must be followed if a train operating company proposes to close a station or any part of a station. That process has simply not been followed in this instance.
“For instance, it requires a 12-week consultation. Of course that is nothing like what is being currently undertaken by the train operating companies.”
The mayors intend to send a pre-action protocol letter to operators in their areas, setting out why they believe closing ticket offices in this way is unlawful.
A spokesperson for the RDG said: “All train operators are complying with the consultation process as set out in the ticketing and settlement agreement.
“They include proposals which, across the network as a whole, would see more staff on concourses and ticket halls to help passengers than there are today, helping with a whole range of needs, from buying tickets to journey planning and helping with accessibility needs.”
Mish Rahman says is it matter of ‘serious concern’ he was blocked from being Labour candidate over how he voted on NEC
Mish Rahman has posted the full text of his statement about the decision to block him from the contest to be Labour’s next candidate for Wolverhampton West on Twitter. (See 11.34am.)
He says it is a matter of “serious concern” that he was blocked because of how he voted on a matter before the national executive committee (NEC). And he says that, even though he has been blocked from being on a longlist himself, as an NEC member he is still choosing who gets included in other longlists. He says:
As a two-term, currently elected member of Labour’s NEC, I have chaired panels for longlisting in other parliamentary selections – I am therefore allowed to longlist candidates but not to be longlisted myself.
I was blocked for how I voted on the NEC in relation to the composition of party disciplinary structures, following the EHRC report. This was a position shared by an array of NEC members, including trade union representatives. Being blocked for casting a vote in a democratic process should be a serious concern for all of us in the Labour party.
I have not made the longlist in the Wolverhampton West parliamentary selection despite the backing of seven trade unions and affiliates.
I have chaired longlisting panels for other Parliamentary selections but deemed not a 'high quality candidate' to be longlisted myself. pic.twitter.com/0PPufZQvkz
— Mish Rahman (@mish_rahman) July 18, 2023
“,”url”:”https://twitter.com/mish_rahman/status/1681227085082238976″,”id”:”1681227085082238976″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”0b0b0d25-ebbe-45fb-a649-f3065fda5f8d”}}”>
I have not made the longlist in the Wolverhampton West parliamentary selection despite the backing of seven trade unions and affiliates.
I have chaired longlisting panels for other Parliamentary selections but deemed not a ‘high quality candidate’ to be longlisted myself. pic.twitter.com/0PPufZQvkz
— Mish Rahman (@mish_rahman) July 18, 2023
Momentum, the leftwing Labour group, has condemned the decision to exclude Rahman from the selection contest. A Momentum spokesperson said:
The vital signs of Labour party democracy are flashing red. It is simply indefensible that a member of Labour’s own executive can be blocked from standing for selection for a free vote on the NEC despite previously being entrusted with overseeing MP selections elsewhere.
There are two urgent questions in the Commons after 12.30pm, on the Post Office Horizon scandal and then on the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). That means Ben Wallace, the defence secretary, won’t start his statement on the defence command paper until after 1.30pm. Johnny Mercer, the veterans minister, will then give a statement on the resettlement of Afghans.
Patrick Maguire from the Times says not one shadow minister spoke out against the party’s policy on the two-child benefit cap at shadow cabinet this morning. He says that Keir Starmer and Jonathan Ashworth defended the position, and that Pat McFadden and Lisa Nandy were supportive, but that discontent in the party is still “simmering”.
Labour welfare rebellion latest: understand not one shadow cabinet minister spoke out against party policy on the two-child limit at their meeting this morning.
— Patrick Maguire (@patrickkmaguire) July 18, 2023
n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/patrickkmaguire/status/1681251590215196672″,”id”:”1681251590215196672″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”df148641-b73c-48a0-a599-b0ec8481e593″}}”>
Labour welfare rebellion latest: understand not one shadow cabinet minister spoke out against party policy on the two-child limit at their meeting this morning.
— Patrick Maguire (@patrickkmaguire) July 18, 2023
Sir Keir Starmer and Jonathan Ashworth spoke in defence of the party's position.
Pat McFadden and Lisa Nandy both made supportive contributions before the discussion moved on.
Discontent still simmering but showdown some feared averted for now.
— Patrick Maguire (@patrickkmaguire) July 18, 2023
n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/patrickkmaguire/status/1681252161940848640″,”id”:”1681252161940848640″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”b6a20601-e6bc-4684-a0bb-f8d0e19d1558″}}”>
Sir Keir Starmer and Jonathan Ashworth spoke in defence of the party’s position.
Pat McFadden and Lisa Nandy both made supportive contributions before the discussion moved on.
Discontent still simmering but showdown some feared averted for now.
— Patrick Maguire (@patrickkmaguire) July 18, 2023