Wednesday’s Prime Minister’s Questions will be the last before Parliament is suspended, or “prorogued”, ahead of the start of a new session on May 13.
The weekly grilling is likely to see Sir Keir face further questions from the Conservatives about Lord Peter Mandelson, following a day when Labour MPs were whipped to oppose a Tory motion calling for the Prime Minister to be investigated over his insistence that due process was followed in the peer’s appointment as ambassador to the US.
Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch speaking in the House of Commons (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA)
PA Wire
The motion from Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch would have seen Sir Keir referred to the Commons Privileges Committee in an echo of the process that eventually ended Boris Johnson’s political career.
Mrs Badenoch has accused the Prime Minister of misleading the Commons when he claimed due process was followed and no pressure was exerted to grant Lord Mandelson security clearance against official advice.
But despite a rebellion by 15 backbenchers, Labour MPs voted decisively against launching an investigation by a majority of 112 – slightly less than the Government’s working majority of 165.
Following the vote, Mrs Badenoch accused Labour MPs of being complicit in a “cover-up”, saying they would “rue the day” they voted against an inquiry.
Downing Street described the move as a “desperate political stunt”, adding the Government would co-operate with existing parliamentary inquiries into the Mandelson affair.
One of those inquiries took a step forward on Tuesday, with the announcement that Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) had finished reviewing the Government’s requests to redact documents relating to the appointment before they are published in line with a demand from the Commons in February.
The Government could still challenge those decisions at a private committee hearing, and it is unlikely that any further documents will be published before Parliament is prorogued on Wednesday.
ISC chairman Lord Beamish said the committee had “made exceptional efforts to ensure that it is not holding up the publication of documents” and any delay in publication of the documents was “in no way due to the committee’s part in the process”.
The Prime Minister has consistently denied misleading the House, leaning on the conclusion of former cabinet secretary Sir Chris Wormald that “appropriate processes” were followed.
But earlier on Tuesday, former senior Foreign Office mandarin Sir Philip Barton declined to endorse Sir Keir’s assessment, saying it was for MPs to form their own view.
Sir Philip told the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee it was unusual for the peer’s appointment to be announced before security vetting had been completed and suggested there was pressure to “get on with” approving Lord Mandelson’s developed vetting (DV).
The committee also heard from Sir Keir’s former chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, who insisted he did not “ask officials to ignore procedures, request that steps should be skipped, or communicate explicitly or implicitly that checks should be cleared at all costs” during the appointment of Lord Mandelson.
